PDA

View Full Version : Commissioners delay height-limit decision


SoWalSally
07-07-2006, 02:59 PM
By DOTTY NIST

An ordinance that would have set a height limit for new construction in all of Walton County has been tabled for further study after "a lot of public comment," to quote Pat Blackshear, county growth management director.

Since 2001, all new construction south of the bay has been limited to 50 feet or less. No such limitation exists in the remainder of the county to the north.

In recent months, several county commissioners have expressed an interest in applying the same height restriction to the county as a whole.

The Walton County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) first looked at the current ordinance proposing to set such a limit, at the June 13 BCC meeting. On June 8, the Walton County Planning Commission had voted six to one to recommend against the adoption of the ordinance.

The proposed ordinance provided exceptions for "agriculture and industrial land uses."

Several Choctaw Beach residents have been the most vocal opponents of extending height limitations north of the bay.

Ed Bradley, a resident and homeowner in the small bayside community near the Walton/Okaloosa County line, said that when he bought his home, he felt that someday there would be condominiums there. Bradley charged that the ordinance would lower land values and affect economic development in the area.

Wayland Davis, also of Choctaw Beach, called for the development of a viable plan for construction height based on what heights are suitable for the various areas. Not every property will "sell as a view," he explained.

"There is no need," commented local resident and realtor David Kramer, suggesting that the ordinance would result in sprawl.

"Allow the sun to shine before twelve o'clock," countered Seagrove resident Bob Dobes, who said he also owns property north of the bay. Dobes said that with lower construction heights, "you can make a good profit, but when does it just come to greed?"

He urged that if heights higher than 50 feet are allowed, that those developments be moved at least a mile from the bay that building heights be staggered in order to preserve the bay view for the public.

South Walton county resident Alan Ficarra suggested that opponents of the height ordinance might benefit if they worked together to create a neighborhood plan to foster a community "with their vision." Other local communities such as Inlet Beach have developed code-sanctioned neighborhood plans setting standards for height and other aspects of development.

Blackshear observed that some areas of the county are affected by the mission of Eglin Air Force Base. Her recommendation was that the commissioners direct staff to work with Eglin officials and come back with delineations of various areas of the county and appropriate construction height standards for each. "It is very uncommon not to have a height restriction," Blackshear observed.

While the matter is being studied, if someone proposes to develop a 200-foot-tall condominium north of the bay, for example, she added, "there is nothing in the code that will stop it."Ý

However, Blackshear continued, the county's maximum building density ranges from 10 to 12 units per acre. Those densities would make high rises unlikely, she noted.

District 5 Commissioner Cindy Meadows agreed, commenting that if a developer is only able to build 10 units on an acre, she would not expect that he would opt to build a 10-story building with each of the units on top of the other.

District 4 Commissioner Ro Cuchens agreed with Blackshear's suggestion for additional work on the ordinance in conjunction with Eglin. He moved for approval of that course of action.

The motion was approved 4-0, with Brannon, Cuchens, Meadows, and Pridgen voting in favor and Jones not present for the vote.

Smiling JOe
07-07-2006, 07:16 PM
The Walton County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) first looked at the current ordinance proposing to set such a limit, at the June 13 BCC meeting. On June 8, the Walton County Planning Commission had voted six to one to recommend against the adoption of the ordinance.
I am curious to know who voted against the ordinance? Anyone know. If several commissioners are suggesting the height restrictions, why are most of them now against it? I seem to remember Ro Cuchens bringing it up a few months ago, suggesting that we need the height restriction. :idontno: I guess his people think they are left with no pie.

Beach Runner
07-07-2006, 07:24 PM
Damn. It's a matter of time before 30-A turns into Destin. I remember when people on 30-A objected to SIGNS. My, how things have changed. Monetary greed is a powerful driving force.

nowgirl
07-07-2006, 07:45 PM
Damn. It's a matter of time before 30-A turns into Destin. I remember when people on 30-A objected to SIGNS. My, how things have changed. Monetary greed is a powerful driving force.

This does not apply to 30-A where height restrictions are in place. It will never look like Destin :clap_1:

TooFarTampa
07-07-2006, 07:55 PM
I am curious to know who voted against the ordinance? Anyone know. If several commissioners are suggesting the height restrictions, why are most of them now against it? I seem to remember Ro Cuchens bringing it up a few months ago, suggesting that we need the height restriction. :idontno: I guess his people think they are left with no pie.

The article says the planning commission voted 6-1 against the restrictions. Isn't that a separate entity from the County Commission?

It is possible in the future that the sheer volume of people moving into the state will require higher buildings in north Walton, but those factors are not coming into play now, and I see no reason why a universal height restriction should not be put into place. It can always be lifted for the areas north of the bay at a later time, if necessary.

Smiling JOe
07-07-2006, 08:14 PM
The article says the planning commission voted 6-1 against the restrictions. Isn't that a separate entity from the County Commission?

It is possible in the future that the sheer volume of people moving into the state will require higher buildings in north Walton, but those factors are not coming into play now, and I see no reason why a universal height restriction should not be put into place. It can always be lifted for the areas north of the bay at a later time, if necessary.

:doh:

Beach Runner
07-07-2006, 10:03 PM
This does not apply to 30-A where height restrictions are in place. It will never look like Destin :clap_1:
So can I sleep soundly tonight?

nowgirl
07-08-2006, 01:11 PM
Tonight and every night!

Smiling JOe
07-08-2006, 03:38 PM
The article says the planning commission voted 6-1 against the restrictions. Isn't that a separate entity from the County Commission?

It is possible in the future that the sheer volume of people moving into the state will require higher buildings in north Walton, but those factors are not coming into play now, and I see no reason why a universal height restriction should not be put into place. It can always be lifted for the areas north of the bay at a later time, if necessary.

If a height limitation is put into place and then lifted, don't you think that the existing limitation in SoWal could also stand a chance to be lifted, too? I would rather them not lifting such restrictions once enacted.

Beach Runner
07-08-2006, 03:42 PM
If a height limitation is put into place and then lifted, don't you think that the existing limitation in SoWal could also stand a chance to be lifted, too? I would rather them not lifting such restrictions once enacted.
EXACTLY!

TooFarTampa
07-09-2006, 02:53 PM
If a height limitation is put into place and then lifted, don't you think that the existing limitation in SoWal could also stand a chance to be lifted, too? I would rather them not lifting such restrictions once enacted.

:doh: Of course that makes perfect sense. :biggrin:

I'm not sure in that case then that enacting a height restriction in north county is a great idea. Kurt keeps saying that in 10-20 years, we won't even recognize the area, and it seems to me if there is a true need for places to put people, little towns like Freeport might actually need an office park or two with hi-rises. You can't squeeze a lot of industry into 4 stories, if the land itself has become very valuable. I would be all for restrictions on what you can build on the north edge of the bay. I am not familiar with the area, but any ideas that would restrict high-rises and/or open waterfront to the public for parks or other benefits is a great long-term idea, if indeed Walton is headed for a population explosion in the coming decades. Perhaps that is what the planning commission is thinking?

Smiling JOe
07-09-2006, 05:39 PM
TFT, That is exactly what Albert Parish, Chairman of the Planning Comm, is thinking. That is probably why he bought so much land in Freeport.

TooFarTampa
07-09-2006, 07:23 PM
TFT, That is exactly what Albert Parish, Chairman of the Planning Comm, is thinking. That is probably why he bought so much land in Freeport.

:popcorn: It's really going to be interesting to see how this turns out.

I think Walton county, along with other Panhandle counties, has a rare opportunity to embrace intelligent growth. We have a good idea what is coming -- the U.S. population is expected to hit 350 million by 2025. That's an extra 50 million people. How many will be coming to Florida? A bunch. I would guess that 1-2 million more people in the Panhandle is not unthinkable. Maybe more? :idontno:

Walton can be the jewel of the area if handled properly. I know a lot of people are upset by the development of 30-A, and I certainly understand their regret at losing a previously unspoiled beach, but my perspective is different. I was born in St. Pete and Pinellas County has been built out since I was a little girl. My dad, an architect, was one of the very few voices railing against high rises and unchecked development along the barrier islands, and he was mocked loudly and often. But he was right. I have never liked driving along Gulf Boulevard in Pinellas County. You can't even see the water in most places.

In contrast, the other side of St. Pete, near downtown along Tampa Bay, has become something wonderful in the past 15 years. There is an enormous amount of walkable, usable public parkland along the waterfront that city planners set aside decades ago. Downtown was in decline for many years but now it is vibrant. The high-rises have increased dramatically in number but they are across the street from the water and they are architecturally appealing. Nobody minds them because they still get gorgeous views of the water. Downtown has a number of beautiful shops and great restaurants, a movie theater, and tons of activity. Just north of downtown is a beautifully preserved national historic district.

Wouldn't it be wonderful to have a similar vibrant, well-planned community on the north side of Choctawhatchee Bay? I think development is inevitable. I think, given what I have seen elsewhere along Florida's beaches, that it has been handled reasonably well along 30-A, wonderfully in some cases. (I am pro-turtle and generally anti-seawall, for the record.) I like to see developments like Owl's Head going up elsewhere in the county because it means at least somebody is thinking about what things are going to look like in 20 years, and not just about making a pile of money. The real estate market may well stagnate for 5 or more years, but the down cycle will in the long run be just a blip. All we can hope for is that the county remembers that it has a rare opportunity, and treasures it accordingly.

Bob
07-09-2006, 10:28 PM
TFT, thank goodness you are an idealist. I sadly believe that summer traffic along 30A may eventually be heading in the direction of Sanibel Island gridlock. My only hope is that 30a keeps its height restrictions and ends up more like Anna Marie Island than it's neighbor Longboat Key.

SHELLY
07-10-2006, 03:02 PM
TFT, thank goodness you are an idealist. I sadly believe that summer traffic along 30A may eventually be heading in the direction of Sanibel Island gridlock. My only hope is that 30a keeps its height restrictions and ends up more like Anna Marie Island than it's neighbor Longboat Key.

Sanibel's height restriction is no higher than a palm tree and they have a $6.00 toll bridge--and still they have traffic problems.

Like Yogi Berra said, "Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded." :funn: