PDA

View Full Version : Gulf Drilling


Seadog
04-04-2006, 03:36 PM
PENSACOLA BEACH PRESERVATION AND HISTORIC SOCIETY
MEDIA STATEMENT ON APRIL 6, 2006 PUBLIC HEARING
FLORIDA’S GULF COAST PROPOSED OIL AND GAS DRILLING

Date: April 4, 2006
Contact: Victoria Clarkin, PBPHS President


The Pensacola Beach and Preservation Society (PBPHS) will not be able to send representation to the April 6, 2006 public hearing in Tallahassee on the Minerals Management Service proposed plan to open two million acres off Florida’s Gulf Coast to oil and gas drilling.

The location, date and time of the public hearing is inconvenient, at best, for those people who this plan affects most. The fact that the public hearing is not being offered in coastal towns, where residents can participate or at a time other than the middle of the day when most are at work, is disturbing. Also, the Interior Department is offering only one public hearing on the subject.

Given a valid opportunity to participate, the PBPHS would have loudly voiced an opinion against opening up two million acres in the eastern Gulf of Mexico to new oil and gas drilling.

Proponents of the plan, which would set federal oil and gas policy until 2012, say that gas production off the Panhandle coast can not become a threat to the marine or coastal environment, to the tourism economy or the coastal residents. The Clean Water Network of Florida Inc., states that routine offshore drilling activity releases thousands of pounds of toxic chemicals into the air, harms fish and marine mammals and places Florida at risk of a large catastrophic spill.

The Florida PIRG tells us each drilling platform would legally dump over 90,000 tons of heavy metals, mud and toxic chemicals into the Gulf of Mexico annually. Pollution from offshore drilling causes a wide range of health and reproductive problems for fish and marine life. A 500 gallon spill, such as the one from a Louisiana rig this past June, would be common. A catastrophic spill could spoil the ecology and economic value of Florida beaches completely.

The Gulf of Mexico has recently suffered an onslaught of devastating hurricanes with waves of 50 feet or more. Waters off the coast of Alabama and Louisiana are already cluttered with oil industry waste and debris scattered by hurricane force winds. Warmer waters and climate changes are predicted to bring more severe storms. Now is not the time to build new rigs in the Gulf.

The EPA has already issued a warning that the Gulf of Mexico is polluted. The Gulf’s fisheries are currently in a state of collapse. For over a year now, red tide has plagued the Gulf Coast of Florida like never before. This created a 2000 square mile dead zone which killed hundreds of dolphins, sea-turtles and manatees.

An overall environmental picture tells us any further industrialization of the Gulf is in violation of the Clean Water Act, and would be unconscionable. So why are lawmakers ready to risk Florida tourism, fisheries and military activities? Pro-drilling advocates claim an immediate need for the oil and gas and this need justifies the risk. The truth is drilling in the eastern Gulf will do nothing to reduce prices or alleviate shortages for years to come, if ever.

Pensacola Beach Preservation Society is contacting our legislators today to ask they attend the public hearing in Tallahassee and speak against opening more acres in the gulf for oil and gas drilling. Concerned individuals can do the same through the following

Internet link: http://floridapirg.org/FL.asp?id=464&id4=ES

Contact forms:

Representative Jeff B. Miller: http://jeffmiller.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home

Senator Bill Nelson: http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Senator Mel Martinez:
http://martinez.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.ContactFor m&CFID=68226908&CFTOKEN=46217204

If you would like to send a copy of this to your local representative and add a comment at the end please use this link below:

Representative Dave Murzin and Senator Charlie Clary

http://citizenspeak.org/node/177

Seadog
04-06-2006, 11:20 AM
CONGRESSMAN MILLER'S COMMENTS TO THE MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

Washington, DC (April 06, 2006) - Congressman Jeff Miller released the following comments to the Minerals Management Service in response to their proposed 5 year plan:


I write to you regarding the Minerals Management Service’s (MMS) proposed five-year Outer Continental Shelf leasing plan. It is my hope that MMS will consider my comments, and all of the comments submitted by my fellow Floridians, when they consider the prospect of drilling off the coast of Florida waters in the very near future.

Let me say from the onset that I recognize the need for a national energy policy and I look forward to working with the administration and leaders in Congress on a policy that meets our future needs while remaining sensitive to the concerns of Florida.

However, compromising the mission of the U.S. military in the Gulf of Mexico with oil and gas exploration is not and never will be a viable option.

Since 2001, I have maintained that drilling east of 86’41”, commonly referred to as the “military mission line”, would interfere with the Air Force’s Testing and Evaluation missions conducted above the Gulf of Mexico from Key West to the Western Panhandle of Florida. Now, with the closing of the ranges in Vieques, Puerto Rico, the Gulf of Mexico is also home to a number of training missions for our military, specifically those conducted by the U.S. Navy. If petroleum companies were allowed to begin to explore and inventory the area, serious encroachments on our military training exercises and testing and evaluation missions would be created.

Last year, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld reiterated that message indicating that drilling east of the military missions line would be “incompatible with military activities” in the Gulf of Mexico.

While I am pleased that the current MMS five-year proposal calls for no new drilling east of the military mission line, I am concerned of the steady march to the east that MMS has taken in the last decade. This plan proposes lease sales right up to 86’41”. My question is how far east will the march continue?

One of the biggest problems I have with this five-year plan, and the events leading up to its unveiling, is that MMS has overtly and intentionally altered the Eastern Gulf of Mexico Planning Area boundary in order to be able to say, “There are no lease sales proposed in the Eastern Planning Area.” However, the proposal opens a large portion of Lease Sale 181 for leasing which was, until recently, entirely within the Eastern Planning Area. MMS did this without input from the State of Florida or its residents.

MMS has told my office repeatedly that the boundary change was to “better define what an ‘Affected State’ is.” One would think that proposing drilling 100 miles dues south of Pensacola would make Florida an “Affected State.” Well not according to the new MMS boundaries! MMS has conveniently divided up those waters south of my district, and made Alabama, Mississippi, and even Louisiana the “Affected States.” This is a political shell game being played by MMS and the Department of Interior, and serves no purpose except to exclude Floridians from the right to comment about what happens directly off their pristine shores.

Most Floridians oppose offshore oil drilling because of the threat it presents to the state's greatest natural and economic resource: our coastal environment. Florida's beaches, fisheries, and wildlife draw millions of tourists each year from around the globe, supporting our state's largest industry Tourism is estimated to have a multi-billion impact on the economy of the five western counties of the Florida Panhandle alone.

Many of the Members of the Florida Congressional Delegation have been working in good faith to allow for drilling in portions of Lease Area 181 in exchange for permanent protections in other areas of the Eastern Planning Area. This MMS proposal would harm the balance of this delicate negotiation and potentially shut it down completely. Once these leases are sold, it is difficult and expensive to buy them back.

I request that the new five year plan respect the direction the State of Florida, and most of its Congressional Delegation, wish to take by returning to the previous maps of the Western, Central and Eastern planning areas, and excluding the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, the South Atlantic, and the Straits of Florida from the 2007-2012 five-year plan.

I know that you will experience pressure to reverse the status quo and include these environmentally-sensitive and mission-critical areas in the five-year plan. I am vigorously opposed to this action, and I trust that the Minerals Management Service will make the right decision to protect Florida’s fragile coastal ecosystem that is so vital to our economic health. Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to hearing from you very soon.

ecopal
04-06-2006, 06:34 PM
additional contact info. with phone numbers:

Senator Martinez, Mel - (R - FL)
317 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3041
Web Form: martinez.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactIn...

Sen. Nelson, Bill - (D - FL)
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Repr. Jeff Miller
Washington D.C.
324 Cannon HOB
Washington, Washington DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-4136
Fax: (202) 225-3414

Ft. Walton Beach Office
348 S.W. Miracle Strip Parkway, Suite 24
Fort Walton Beach, Florida 32548
Phone: 850-664-1266
Fax: 850-664-0851

Pensacola Office
4300 Bayou Blvd., Suite 12
Pensacola, Florida 32503
Phone: 850-479-1183
Fax: 850-479-9394

Toll Free Phone Number to District Office
Pensacola, Florida
Phone: 866-367-1614


Gov. Jeb Bush
www.flgov.com
850-488-7146
fax: 850-487-0801

southof30A
04-06-2006, 09:42 PM
In case anyone wants to make a personal visit to these locales, or SoWal for that matter, I'm sure stable facilities will be available for your horses...

aquaticbiology
04-08-2006, 09:11 AM
In case anyone wants to make a personal visit to these locales, or SoWal for that matter, I'm sure stable facilities will be available for your horses...

hey - that's MY metaphor!

they put anything east of the MML and it won't be there for long - either a drone from tyndall will fall on it or a stray missle will take it out

we've had some close calls just fishing there

Everytime
04-08-2006, 01:12 PM
It's a wonder just how many people thought the Earth was easy to defend. -The Samples

I hate that this keeps coming back up every year. If you give MMS (and the oil companies and the Venezuelan communist head of state/Citgo executive) an inch in the Gulf, they'll gradually take a geographical region, as Congressman Miller is finding out. Former Congressman Scarborough was such a bulldog on this and shut Clinton, the late Governor Chiles, and W up for awhile, but today's gas prices are being used as a new cry for exploration/exploitation, whichever you want to call it. I'm glad Miller is taking a stand on the issue, but I would prefer that the boundary be returned to the old "Eastern Gulf"/"Western Gulf" line, which was near Fort Morgan, Alabama. The 86'41" boundary is near Navarre Beach.

~Everytime

southof30A
04-08-2006, 09:01 PM
It's a wonder just how many people thought the Earth was easy to defend. -The Samples

I hate that this keeps coming back up every year. If you give MMS (and the oil companies and the Venezuelan communist head of state/Citgo executive) an inch in the Gulf, they'll gradually take a geographical region, as Congressman Miller is finding out. Former Congressman Scarborough was such a bulldog on this and shut Clinton, the late Governor Chiles, and W up for awhile, but today's gas prices are being used as a new cry for exploration/exploitation, whichever you want to call it. I'm glad Miller is taking a stand on the issue, but I would prefer that the boundary be returned to the old "Eastern Gulf"/"Western Gulf" line, which was near Fort Morgan, Alabama. The 86'41" boundary is near Navarre Beach.

~Everytime
Subsurface accumulations of oil and gas do not necessarily conform to a line drawn on a map. That's why we have to drill for oil in some pretty inhospitable places. We gotta go where Mother Nature put it. Would we rather drill for oil and gas in central Nevada than offshore Florida - probably, but that's not where the geologists have picked; anyway, chances are someone would object to us being in Nevada as well.

Bob
05-18-2006, 03:56 PM
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/orl-edped181051806may18,0,6352376.story?coll=orl-opinion-headlines