PDA

View Full Version : West Bay Sector Plan


bsmart
05-19-2008, 01:37 AM
I have known about the plan to relocate and expand the Panama City-Bay County International Airport for quite some time, but did not really know the level of detailed planning efforts that have gone into this project. I recently read that in February of this year, a U.S. District Court judge in Florida allowed for the next phase of project planning to take place, because the opponents of the airport, having the burden of proof, failed to demonstrate that there had been some procedural violation under NEPA and the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers when they granted the Airport Authority with the permits needed to proceed with construction.

I discovered that the St. Joe Company has a mitigation plan called the West Bay Sector Plan, which would essentially restore on approximately 9,608 acres, habitat similar to that which will be lost on approximately 4,000 acres as a result of the airport relocation project. The point of this post is the gauge your thoughts on this project and on the West Bay Sector Plan (http://www.joe.com/web/JoeStory/ConservationByCooperation/westbaysectorplan). Do any of you have any familiarity or experience with the St. Joe Company's other environmental mitigation or restoration/conservation projects?

SoWalSally
05-19-2008, 08:28 AM
Here's a link to the map - http://www.joe.com/NR/rdonlyres/C411944B-28C7-4C02-97F1-746C00B62428/4991/sectorplanmap.pdf



Some links



http://www.floridahabitat.org/case-studies-1/west-bay-sector-plan-bay-county/west-bay-sector-plan/



http://www.1000friendsofflorida.org/Panhandle/WestBay.asp



http://fl.audubon.org/specialplaces_WestBay.html

sowalgayboi
05-20-2008, 03:13 PM
I'm a little leary on those very general "development blobs". The main reason being that the area directly south of the new airport that creates a "bump" into the bay has always been slated by Joe to become a development called Breakfast Point. The original plan showed the entire "bump" being developed. Seems to me that wouldn't fall under preservation.

scooterbug44
05-20-2008, 03:23 PM
I am extremely skeptical of any St. Joe environmental projects. There's always another shoe that hasn't dropped or a rule change on the horizon!

sowalgayboi
05-21-2008, 11:25 PM
I agree SB, with the new management I'm a little skeptical as well. They are in the is to turn a profit and the impact is not as closely regarded as it was in the past.

Mark Partington
05-23-2008, 10:36 PM
Since corporations are leglly 'persons', unusual ones; I think by the FBI's definition & the world health organizations criteria.....they are diagnosed as phsycopaths.
I think sociopathic might be better,dunno....wordplay. They are legally bound to their shareholders 1st,by law.....everything else,including environmental P.R. & well worded "mission staements"....well
I wouldlike to see case by case studies of what was "swapped" for What......
I did see a lovely young lady staying in the seagrove area be dragged off & appeared to be beaten by the new urban border patrol....she had wandered west into